Looking for:
Mastercam 2018 3d roughing free |
Another mastercam vs hypermill discussion... Emphasis on Volumill..Mastercam 2018 3d roughing free
Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. Forums New posts Search forums. Media New media New comments Search media. Everywhere Threads This forum This thread. New posts. Search forums. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser. Another mastercam vs hypermill discussion Emphasis on Volumill. T Start date Jun 10, Replies 57 Views 2, T Cast Iron. Joined Jul 23, Location Los Angeles. I know this gets brought up every now and again, I've read all the recent posts. I'd like to discuss again before we pull the trigger. Perhaps someone has some new insight. I just joined a high end aerospace company as their 5 axis guy. We are looking to upgrade our cam system.
I use Mastercam, they use Gibbs. We are looking at either Mastercam or Hypermill. Most of our parts are prismatic in nature, less organic or mold type features. But I suspect that will change now that I'm on board.
Everything about hypermill seems great to me. With one BIG exception. They use volumill, which in my experience with Gibbs is an absolute dumpster fire compared to Optirough, or iMachining.
Now Gibbs isn't exactly on top of their game, so it's possible their implementation of volumills processing isn't as good as it could be. I have given hypermill a few test cuts to compare to mastercam and Gibbs. The Gibbs toolpath is almost identical.
The mastercam toolpath destroys both. So with all that in mind, do you find that the advantages of hypermill outweigh the dated roughing algorithms found in volumill? Finally tell my anything else I don't know about hypermill vs mastercam that we should consider before making the purchase. Joined Nov 14, Location canada. I wouldn't suggest learning a new software and trying to impressing your new employer at the same time. You won't be able to do both.
You know what Mastercam can do, why risk your reputation on software you don't know. While I agree with you in principle, I've known my new employer for many years. We are good. He knows it'll be months before we get anywhere. Joined Oct 27, Location On Tour I believe, Hypermill like all has a big learning curve.
Joined Sep 8, T said:. Click to expand We're in Chatsworth area. I've definitely heard a lot of good things about NX. But isn't it primarily useful for Siemens controls? We are a Heidenhain shop At least in the 5 axis department. I'm sure it doesn't actually matter, but that's my understanding anyway.
Also what do you dislike about hypermill? I already know what I dislike about mastercam. I think it's a very good all around cam package, but it certainly has it's issues. Maybe 10 percent of the time it sucks Hank on copy is our post developer. He'll respond with a quote as soon as the form is completed.
With that Micron on the way, we'll want to get the post sorted out as soon as possible. There are posts the come out of the box with NX that could be used in a pinch. But normally we want to have a post ready when the machine lands and is ready for testing. Best, the mastercam and hypermill quotes i've gotten were right along this price, give or take k, but as we all know, thats without a TRUE CAD system.
What's the other 'grammers there like - up for a challenge? Do they like change? If they are, why wait until you arrive to update the place? Or are they just telling you yeh yeh yeh we're interested, while they actually don't want it? Because splitting the dept to 5ax only, where you have a total different set of tools, potentially sets you up for a whole lot of finger pointing, from the rest of them.
Do you need solidworks - how many models do you create, or is it not many because you receive them from customers - in which case Mastercams Well, NX's in reality Remembering of course, you need holiday and sick cover - so when Brian is away, "someone" will be able to open your files and drive the software because when you're away, there WILL be problems I'm not dampening - just pointing out some thinking points Larry Dickman Titanium.
Joined Jan 30, Location Temecula, Ca. Mastercam pretty well sucks, hands down. It's only advantage is that any idiot can download a crack and learn it on their kitchen table. Hypermill is far beyond. I liked Optirough a lot better than Volumill. Keep in mind that MC bought Opti, they had nothing to do with it, which is why it works. When I first used Volumill, I was disappointed. I thought it was a real pile of shit. They made some upgrades and now I think it works pretty good. Hypermill has a new roughing module but I haven't had a chance to try it yet, but it's supposed to blow volumill away.
Larry Dickman said:. Also who did mastercam but Optirough from? I didn't know that. Is it MW? You must log in or register to reply here. Similar threads M. Learning Hypermill. Replies 10 Views 3K. Dec 3, BluishInventor. Hypermill vs. Replies 33 Views 6K.
Jun 12, Rick Finsta. Mastercam Optirough Stepup Parameters. Replies 55 Views 4K. May 12, pato. Poll Fusion vs.
Mastercam 2018 3d roughing free.Mastercam - Wikipedia
Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. Forums New posts Search forums. Media New media New comments Search media. Everywhere Threads This forum This thread. New posts. Search forums. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. You are using an out of date browser.
It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Another mastercam vs hypermill discussion Emphasis on Volumill. T Start date Jun 10, Replies 57 Views 2, Prev 1 2 3 Next. First Prev 2 of 3 Go to page. As a relatively long-time hyperMILL user, my 1 complaint for years was the quality of roughing. They have invested heavily in their proprietary roughing strategy, and it has become exponentially better than it was. I don't think it's the best on the market, but it's no longer an obvious limitation.
I start just about every program with 3D adaptive roughing, and have probably only used volumill a couple of times in the last year. I actually preferred the programming workflow in Esprit by a lot , but training MCAM programmers on Esprit was always a painful ordeal. It's not a big deal. With templates setup, importing an assembly for multiple operations and assigning layers takes about 60 seconds.
Modifying the assembly in Solidworks and re-importing part of it is only a few clicks. Last edited: Jun 12, Click to expand Joined Oct 27, Location On Tour Mastercam went to court over the highspeed toolpath algorithm and won.
I can't remember who it was against I'm also thinking that the person who wrote it was employed as a contractor who then left and created their own business with it BluishInventor Aluminum. Joined Jul 7, We recently switched over to Hypermill from CamWorks. Both use volumill.
And you'd be correct when mentioning how implementation matters. Volumill just works in hypermill. It's calc times are much faster for the same feature, plane detection is great. It's probably the best implementation of Volumill you will get.
I have also used Edgecam which uses the same roughing path as Mastercam's opti-rough from module works. I personally prefer that roughing path over volumill. The main reason being that if you're roughing out a 3 walled pocket, the MW path goes side wall to side wall all the way to the back, then gets the corners.
Where Volumill will rough out a channel into the pocket until it can take a cut that would travel in a U shape around the interior of the pocket. I think this is because Volumill is going for less time in rapid, more time in the cut. The down side for Volumill here is if the pocket wall is thin on all 3 sides, your final roughing pass on each wall will be whatever your stepover is. The huge advantage with Hypermill is the automatic collision detection that OP mentioned.
You define your model and it's considered in most toolpaths. Hemstitching is a breeze cause you just click the surface and go. No avoid surfaces or boundaries to make as to avoid the waterfall or get path extensions right. It does it pretty much how you want it to do it by default. I gave mastercam a shot when I was evaluating CAM systems and it wasn't impressing me at all.
It eventually came down to Esprit and Hypermill which both have similar collision detection mentioned above. Hypermill just had a few extra tools that worked with our needs a bit better, so that's what we went with.
The only thing that it is lacking is a stronger lathe package. It works, but it's not anything to write home about. From simple 2. The depth of the software is also quite nice. You can keep things surface level for simplicity, or you can automate the hell out of everything if you put the time in to build it of course.
It's not hard, just time consuming. Either way, send me a PM if you want some more input about our experience in HM. We are about 10 months into using it. I also have a contact that is using it to the absolute maximum that I have been talking to for a couple years now.
Mike Diamond. Joined Nov 5, Location Tampa area. JPG Joined Dec 20, Location UK. Joined Sep 8, Can you share licenses for individual toolpaths like you do in hyperMILL?
My first seat of HM was about the same price as your NX quote, but the rest have been trimmed down quite a bit. We only have two seats for most of the 5X paths, even though we have 4 seats of HM. Sharing is relatively painless since any seat can pull the 5X license as needed.
On paper NX definitely checks a lot of boxes. We have expensive tastes over here, and it's not easy to satisfy on a budget. I haven't used but they now have v sketch which is dimension driven and can be constrained as well. I have been a HyperMill user for about 10 years now, and have no complaints what so ever. I can't say I have used Volumill or HyperMaxx much for a few years, but the new optimised roughing that replaced the arbitrary roughing strategy is very good.
Great when using high feed tools. Last edited: Jun 13, Mike not sure how to quote your reply directly, but what are you trying to say with that pic? With hyperMILL different seats can share advanced licenses. For instance, you could buy one loaded seat of hyperMILL, and one that is just 3 axis. Then with network licensing, both seats could share one set of 5 axis toolpath licenses.
Or for something really special like port machining, you can buy one license for that, and all of your hyperMILL seats can use it, as long as multiple programmers aren't calculating port machining at the same time.
It's a really nice way to reduce costs that I haven't seen utilized in other CAM platforms. You only pay for what you need, and don't have to buy every single option "just in case". Mike said:. You can double click and edit parameters. Joined Jun 14, I'm curious why no one has brought up PowerMill? Mtndew Diamond. Joined Jun 7, Location Michigan. Mtndew said:. TK, why aren't you at your post?
I'd be surprised if they didn't. Does Hypermill have a 5 axis roughing strategy? BluishInventor said:. Sure does! It's called 5x Shape Offset Roughing.
No comments:
Post a Comment